Nova Iorki:
Democratic vice-presidential candidate, Tim Walz, and his Republican challenger, J.D. Vance, debated in the fourth gallery, while thousands of Americans tuned in, experimentally or only, for the first vice-presidential debate before voting in their country. November 5.
Unlike the presidential debate, which featured personal attacks by both candidates, the vice presidential debate was surprisingly calm, orderly, and civil, with Vance and Walz not engaging in discussion of primarily political issues.
Rather than give in to the slurs, both candidates limited their criticism of the rival presidential candidate. This discussion came as a surprise to most people, especially after an ugly and divisive election campaign that lasted for months – featuring personal attacks, offensive language, racist slurs, inflammatory speeches, and assassination attempts.
The US Vice Presidential debate between J.D. Vance and Tim Walz was surprisingly calm, orderly and civil.
Not in the past, we too, Senators Vance and Walz, will attack each other on the campaign trail, but in the vice presidential debate we will adopt a respectable Tom.
MORE DISCUSSION ON AQUECIDA
The debate was friendly and focused mainly on political issues, but there were some moments of non-final tension, when the Republican candidate was asked a question about whether it was agreed that Donald Trump would lose the US elections in 2020.
During the debate, Vance, who said he was not voted to certify the outcome of the previous presidential election, sidestepped the question when asked whether the vote would be contested this year if Donald Trump loses the election.
Walz responded by blaming Donald Trump's false claims of election fraud that incited a popular attack on the US Capitol in January 2021, which was an attempt to prevent the certification of Joe Biden's 2020 electoral victory.
“He keeps saying (Trump) didn’t lose the election,” Walz said, blaming Vance. Then he asked his competitor directly, asking: “Did (Trump) lose the 2020 elections?” When the Republican nominee once again dodged the question and accused Kamala Harris of continuing to censor opposing viewpoints online, the controversy or his sharpest point became apparent.
“This is an incriminating response,” exclaimed Walz.
“He keeps saying that (Trump) did not lose the 2020 election,” Tim Walz said, addressing J.D. Vance.
The two candidates, who have very different views on all issues, will debate each other on a series of issues: inflation and immigration, economic challenges, abortion and gender issues, the crisis in West Asia and climate change.
Sokos and anti-Sokos
By pitting each other's presidential candidates and not considering their own vulnerabilities, Walz and Vance both evade two of the verbal sycophants they would receive and respond to in equal measure.
Walz exposes Donald Trump as an “instável” leader who puts the interests of billionaires above two commoners, and attacks Donald Trump over his immigration policy. The former president was criticized for “pressuring Republicans in Congress” to abandon the bipartisan border security project.
“Donald Trump has four years to do this. “I promise you, Americans, how easy it will be.”
Vance attacked Democrats over inflation and economic problems and repeatedly asked Kamala Harris why she was unable to resolve these important questions during the four years she was vice president in the Biden administration.
Vance and Walls will also engage in a confrontation over pressing global issues, especially the crises in Europe and West Asia.
“Kamala Harris has very big plans for how she's going to solve the middle class's problems, so she should do them now — not when she's asking for a promotion, but she hasn't served as an American people for three and a half years.” Mr. Vance said.
It will also enter into a confrontation over pressing global issues, especially the crises in Europe and West Asia. Walz described Donald Trump as “very volatile” and “popular” with strongmen like Putin and Netanyahu, and said Trump could not be trusted to handle the conflict-prone region. Vance challenged these claims and stated that when Trump was president, the world was a “safer place” during his tenure.
Donald Trump, who attended the live debate, posted messages — primarily personal attacks — on his Social Truth website, in his trademark style. They attacked the moderators of the debate organized by the North American television network CBS. He also called Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz a “Baeksu Chi” and called him “pathetic.”
During the debate, Republican candidate J.D. Vance, once a staunch Trump supporter, blamed the media for his reporting on Donald Trump and tried to clear things up by saying “I was wrong about Donald Trump.”
He continued, explaining, “This statement is fundamentally wrong, because I believe that some media stories that reveal dishonest inventions from their history. “Most importantly, Donald Trump served the American people.”
Or the “Minnesota Agradville” debate.
The vice presidential debate was between Democratic candidate Tim Walz, 60, a former middle school teacher and current governor of Minnesota with liberal views, and his Republican challenger, J.D. Vance, 40, a former venture capitalist, best-selling author and controversial conservative U.S. senator from Minnesota. Ohio. With some very conservative views on issues like abortion.
Although both candidates portray themselves as Midwesterners, they have sharply opposing views on all the important issues that matter to us in a deeply polarized United States.
Overall, both candidates appear calm and polite, displaying a “Minnesota Nice” attitude throughout the debate.
Although both candidates tried to one-up each other and dodge the occasional uncontested jabs, both men generally seemed calm and polite, and displayed a “Minnesota-nice” attitude during the debate, thanking each other at times.
At the end of the debate, reports and investigations indicate that neither candidate should be less of a “knockout” than the other, nor can they overshadow the other, leading to a balanced debate without a clear winner.
Political analysts believe that vice presidential debates in general do not change the outcome of the presidential election. However, any slight change in public opinion could be decisive, with a naval operation taking place five weeks before election day.
