Editor dos EUA diz que alegações de ‘duquesa difícil’ contra Meghan Markle vieram de ‘fonte muito importante’

To the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan MarkleI was recently checked out after a convincing account of Hollywood ReportHe claimed that her American teams were afraid of her.

However, a US-based source close to the royal family has branded the story false, claiming that no one working close to Meghan would believe she was the “difficult duchess”.

Now, Meyer Roshan, the co-editor of the publication that revealed the complaint, confirms that the confidential information about Meghan Markle came from a source currently involved in the Sussexes.

According to Roshan, co-editor of or hollywood reporter, The article, which claims Meghan often ignores advice and is a “high-flying dictator,” came from someone who remains close to the family.

Speaking to Access Hollywood amid criticism from supporters and a Sussex representative, who calls the allegations “fabricated,” Roshan said: “Our report spoke to a very important source who works for the household, who says, ‘Everyone is mad at him.’ Meghan.”

Depends on how Daily MailThe senior journalist also suggested that the palace may have been built into a story that portrayed Meghan as “difficult” after her departure, suggesting that the “difficult duchess” description may be an exaggeration.

“The Duchess of Difficult is a title that has been around Meghan Markle for a number of years,” he explained. “What’s new is that since she came to America, many of these rumours have been fabricated by the Palace and Bellas reports that we are reporting that this is not true and that there is still a media stream.”

The controversial article highlighted allegations about Meghan's alleged behaviour and the departure of several members of the team already working for the Sussexes, including her chief of staff, Josh Ketler, who resigned in August after just three months in the role.

The story also describes Harry and Meghan as “the most glamorous decision makers” who often change their minds. Harry is portrayed as “a very charming, very charming person”, but also an “enabler” in two supposedly terrifying ways for his wife.

The allegations suggested Meghan was “absolutely cruel”, compared to a “controlling, angry, high-jumping dictator”, and allegedly left “grown men in tears”.

The outer part does THR The article claims that Meghan's “happy beer” and “5 weeks of happy emails” are a translation of the nickname “Duchess Difficult” by her American officials.

Megan has repeatedly refuted her team’s claims of intimidation. She addressed the issue succinctly on the Archetypes podcast, saying, “You have permission to set a limit. Você can be clear; (ISO) doesn’t become a requirement. It doesn’t become difficult, it becomes clear.”

Do it THR The exhibition was widely circulated, and members of the Archewell Foundation denied the accusations, calling them “completely ridiculous.”

One source noted that Meghan and Prince Harry generally work at home and that the title of “duchess tough” was never used.

“The Duke and Duchess work in Montecito and we live in Hollywood. We may think we are all in the same office and that this appointment will end, but under these circumstances we do not allow that.”

“If she is ‘walking’ and ‘taking orders,’ even an Archewell official could say that’s a fait accompli… It’s complete nonsense,” he explained to the source.

Another source addressed allegations that the former “Suits” actress used to send emails every 5 days to the team.

“I have never received an email from someone else’s schedule – and as I have received it, the Duchess specifically states in her email assignment that everyone has a different working day and she does not feel obliged to respond outside of the day,” he said. “Normal working hours, these original appointments make no sense!”

The allegations against Meghan will emerge as Harry prepares to celebrate his 40th anniversary, with a source counting Or espresso The Sussexes were “very anxious at this moment”. THR Artego.

“The Sussex team is full of this kind of stuff, and it’s not right,” said one source. “Everyone is deeply concerned about the timing of the article because it came out just days before Harry’s birthday.”

“There are concerns that there may be a disgruntled former official spreading lies designed to make him look bad,” he continued.

“Camp Sussex’s focus now is on building on last year’s success and building on that positive momentum into 2025 and beyond,” one source added.

Before moving to California, Meghan faced accusations of intimidating palace officials, prompting residents to launch an investigation into claims she “belittled” her aides.

Stories suggest that officials soon find themselves extremely depressed, with some comparing their experiences to post-traumatic stress.

Since the results of the investigation were never made public, Meghan has consistently denied the allegations, with her legal team calling them a “calculated smear campaign.”